The Relationship between Faith and Reason

â€Å"Faith and Reason resemble two wings on which the human soul ascends to the thought of truth† Explain the risks for a scholar when confidence and reason are separated from one another. Use at any rate one case of a Christian instructing that shows the agreement of confidence and reason The congruity of confidence and reason are the grounds whereupon numerous Christian lessons are assembled. This relationship upgrades components of the two develops, anyway the threat of isolating explanation from confidence is that reason will try to demonstrate actually and most sensibly which would make a definitive objective and question be lost in consultation and, then again, isolating confidence from reason would make confidence be seen as minor tale or odd notion. The two must collaborate in equivalent combination all together for the human soul to ascend to the consideration of truth as proposed in the encyclical letter ‘Fides et Ratio’ by the late incomparable pontiff Pope John Paul II. Reason could be essentially characterized as the obvious end result drawn from strict events or the affirmed idea of a custom or practice. Anyway more components of Reason remain constant notwithstanding the possibility of something that can be ‘proven’. Reason is commonly comprehended as the principals for a methodological request, regardless of whether scholarly, good, stylish or strict. 1 Any obtaining of scholarly information, through either direct understanding or contention is a portrayal of ‘reason’ The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Hebrews 11:1 states that â€Å"faith is by and large certain about what we trust in and sure of what we don't see†. The premise of confidence is normally adjusted from the authority of disclosure whether that be immediate (God talking legitimately to an individual), or aberrant (books of the holy book, messages by ministers, and so forth). Confidence delineates a trust in God and his vows to his kin. Pope John Paul II expressed that through Christian lessons, what people can't see or contact is affirmed by faith2 Pope John Paul II, not just tends to the misleading affirmations of current thinkers, however offers a cure by exhibiting reality of the Aristotelian or Tomistic perspective, indicating that confidence and science are in no way, shape or form in opposition to each other, yet that it’s fundamental for the movement of humanityâ€of any kindâ€that confidence and science (or reason) be utilized together. 3 The partition of the two reason a disarray, recently experienced by thinkers, that areas confidence and science/reason as two confined substances. Review this separation in its most straightforward arrangement, the human scholar infers that for one to be dedicated to God, and a strict being, they should dismiss all components of reason and submit exclusively to the ideas of confidence. Then again, one who might have confidence in a more prominent level of reason must be agnostic as any dismissal of God is intrinsically a dismissal of confidence itself. As the world creates and people become increasingly learned, it gets difficult to deny certain realities; anyway this turns into a threat to every strict network as by least complex suspecting, confiding in any proof is seen as a dismissal of trust in God. In this lies the risks for scholars; earlier obviously to John Paul II’s Fides et Ratio 2 3 Fides et Ratio, John Paul II Catholic Champion that recognizes that â€Å"reason and confidence can't be isolated without decreasing the limit of people to know themselves, the world and God in a suitable way †¦There is therefore no explanation behind rivalry of any sort among reason and confidence: each contains the other, and each has its own degree for action† As people, we should emotionally reason inside our own specific circumstances and established understandings of the world which we live, in this manner this will assist us with taking part in our confidence to comprehend the world we watch. 4 Noticeably it tends to be comprehended that confidence, custom and thinking are interlaced inside each other, you can't have one without the other and every one of the 3 components are basic segments in understanding and living ones confidence. The congruity of confidence and reason is best observed through the account of creation. â€Å"By confidence we comprehend that the universe was framed at God’s order, with the goal that what is seen was not made out of what was visible†5. This section features the centrality of the commitments from both confidence and reason through Genesis and the early books of the good book to the legitimacy of conviction. Plato took a stab at clarifying man’s position on the planet and the start within recent memory through the purposeful anecdote of the austere cavern. In the most straightforward structure, the cavern presents the setting whereupon a play of shadows happens. The men in the cavern watch this play being executed from a light source as the main reality they know. While bits of gossip flare of an outside ‘world’ the play proceeds, and ‘reason’ makes theory over what is going to occur straightaway and speculations are created with respect to the reason. After some time, reason will clarify most parts of the show, yet would just hold 4 5 Fides et Ratio, John Paul II 94 Hebrews 11:3 vidence enough to comprehend the soonest snapshots of the show. To arrive at full truth, confidence should be acquainted with really have confidence in the underlying wellspring of light. Besides to the possibility, confidence and reason question what occurs if the light sources goes out; for the play won't â€Å"die† as death is simply a comprehended component of the play. Nobody was around at the hour of creation and nobody h as an immediate information on what occurred; so reason can't affirm whether God did it. In any case, reason recommends that the universe is working and consequently more likely than not had a start. It is complicatedly structured, from the essential laws of material science to the mind boggling intricacy of the human cerebrum. Regardless of whether an individual ganders at the excellence and shouts, â€Å"There must be a God! † or whether that individual needs to plunk down and ascertain the likelihood of these things occurring by some coincidence, the finish of the fair searcher is that nature doesn't account for itself. Besides the sensible confidence in Genesis 1:1, â€Å"In the starting God made the Heavens and the Earth† is a sheer advance of confidence instead of an ignorant cut in obscurity. The thoughts and speculations of past savants have incredibly influenced the separation among confidence and reason anyway John Paul II’s Fides et Ratio has essentially helped the congregation and her kin comprehend and feel good with the idea of a Ã¢â‚¬Ë œcircle’ holding the two elements together in a solid association where one feeds off the other. Scholars face a risk when figuring restricted to the late pope’s conversation as the idea draws inconsistencies and disarray from adherents that prompts the supposition that they are not exactly unwavering according to God for thinking about sensible and demonstrated proof. Olsen, Ross Faith and Reason: What is the Relationship?

How Personal Educational Experiences Influence Teaching Education Essay Free Essays

string(82) I discovered children are partial to making their ain readings based from their experiences. Educating is a remarkable calling that requires love, respect and devotion and great teachers could ever want to pass on enormous adjustments in kids ‘s lives. So as instructors we should be outfitted with subject, achievements, and grow new contemplations and procedures and sprout with adjusting political directions to elevate kids ‘s obtaining who might perpetually require rationale and backing. Instructors looking for long lasting procurement must concede and follow adjustment to all the more likely example ( Vossler, Waitere-Ang, A ; Adams, 2005 ) . We will compose a custom paper test on How Personal Educational Experiences Influence Teaching Education Essay or on the other hand any comparative subject just for you Request Now As we experience life, it is essential that we realize what our identity is, and can perceive and abandon our ain individual qualities and failings. Realizing what we are acceptable at and what we are feeble in is the solitary way we can truly turn as people. This cognizance encourages us to help through the closures we set for ourselves throughout everyday life. Pulling on an extent of writing beneath are my thoughts which region my rising precept of guidance and procurement upheld by ancient rarities from my guidance encounters alongside the spreads in my guidance design and my activity program on how I would go to these spreads. Analogy To me kids are separated from everyone else, skilled and sure researchers like crewmans who investigate the ocean which can be contrasted with a multi-educated and bi-social condition that gives interminable possibilities. The educator ‘s work in my similitude resembles an attendant who works in association with guardians to follow the children ‘s contributions. I unequivocally accept the connections between the child, teacher and parent is a cardinal factor which draws out the power, imagination and thought of child. The teacher as an attendant praises the decent variety of larning kids passing on from their universes as explorers because of grouped personalities. As an attendant the teacher makes abundance of fabulous larning possibilities or high spots characteristic possibilities that emerge. As a researcher, an educator takes part in enquires made by kids with kids †in the two capacities instructor will see kids ‘s enquires as important, motivate propelled thoughts, incite appreciation and go about as an empathetic being. Both the teacher ‘s and the child ‘s work depends on the build of Ako where they show each piece great as learn together. The connection between the teacher and the researcher depends on trust and the capacity of the educator is to develop positive, deferential and antiphonal relationship with the children and their family units and work cooperatively and bring various situations into position. The educator as an attendant watches, helps, proposes and when things are voyaging acceptable soften into the sides of the schoolroom since the researchers as crewmans know their completion. As an attendant the educator gives right level of difficulties to children to look into yet at a similar clasp takes consideration of their wellbeing aspects. The children ‘s works as crewmans include starting to lead the pack and research the universe through the entirety of their faculties. In my representation kids are dynamic researchers who search frontward for larning encounters which esteem their inclusion and use their semantic correspondence and finishing up for arranged purposes. Kids are enabled to parcel their inclusion and human advancement with others and perceive themselves as able and certain researchers. The teachers should move as positive capacity hypothetical records and do certain the standpoint of children ‘s venture is significant, energizing and dependable. The understudies will see themselves pondered this excursion and think of requests on this excursion and the two teachers and students will hold the ability to help them happen the answers. How my own instructive encounters affected my analogy As an understudy I was affected by the discussions of my shrewd keeps an eye on and through substance discernment and looks into I got mindful of how basic it is for educators to gracefully an invigorating and safe condition where kids ‘s association can be followed and continued. I saw how cultural constructivist speculations support quite a bit of youth showing technique and the significance of building up the multi-education achievements of children for which as instructors we have to rethink a methodological examination and setting for kids ‘s securing. My Lectors bestowed me with the significance of providing rich craftsmanship projects to advance the ideal procurement possibilities. As an educator from my point of view visual pictures are ground-breaking signifier of conveying since we live in numerous networks. So during my TE I set up tastefully pleasing condition by traping up pictures stand foring the various developments of my schoolroom which animated the children to inquire about and distinguish crafted by their equivalents and this empowered cultural connection among kids. Instructors should open children to numerous odds and back up them in their ideal exercises ( Young-Loveridge, Peters A ; Carr, 1997 ) I had the option to back up kids ‘s proficiency procurement by putting their own affinities. During both my Teaching Experiences I spoke with guardians by and by furthermore through letters bespeaking them to put their children ‘s leader stories and vocals and pass on it to classification for offering it to others which included parent commitment. I other than verified I was completely insightful of the inborn inside informations of my human advancement before turn toing the social education requests of my researchers which I feel is extremely significant. I figured out how to accurately articulate Karakia from Maori kids and their folks which mirrors the build of Ako in my allegory. During my first Teaching Experience a yearling James demonstrated extraordinary inclusion in perusing his leader book which had the picture of Mama and his angel sloth. I energized and strengthened his contribution by rehashing his preferred book at whatever point he needed me to and connecte d with self-created discussions with him to develop positive connections. I comprehended James had exhibited solid affirmation in me and believed that I would peruse his book at whatever point he required. I other than did an examination concerning why he was so partnered to this book by talking with my Associated Teacher and his parent and discovered this was because of the coming to of his new darling sibling. I discovered children are partial to making their ain readings based from their encounters. You read How Personal Educational Experiences Influence Teaching Education Essay in classification Exposition models All these encounters overallly affected my representation of guidance. Tenet What does it take to be a decent educator? I accept the undermentioned characteristics shape up a decent teacher. A decent teacher must be energetic about his occupation. The educators should consider all to be as certain, able researchers in multi-proficient and bi-social conditions and watch the assorted variety of larning kids passing on from their universes. A teacher needs to hold positive, aware, antiphonal connections and collaborations with their researchers and family units and occur out the various positions. Great educators would be mindful, empathic and interface at individual degree with the children and show echt association in their universe. â€Å" Good teachers are all around distinguished by students as the individuals who care † ( Day, 2009, p.5 ) . Instructors should esteem the impression of association and work turn in glove and cooperatively with guardians and collaborators to increase and advance children ‘s inclusion and basic idea. â€Å" Teachers need to set up positive connections dependent on civility, regular trust and detached speaking with guardians/f amilies and need to work turn in glove, parcel expertness and comprehension with collaborators † ( Groundwater-Smith, Ewing A ; Le Cornu, 2007, p. 334 ) . Great Teachs should work design great conduct, show warmth, energy and be stronger. Instructors have a cognizance of the cultural and social encounters of their researchers and make concrete larning encounters by providing an animating situation to do kids ‘s securing unequivocal. Instructors ought to adequately quantify, survey kids ‘s procurement, flexibly utile criticisms and feature the positive side of the researchers and part it with guardians. All the more significantly teachers need to tune in to their researchers and concede them consistently to advance and activate them. â€Å" Teachers can do seeable the children ‘s obtaining techniques and their ain guidance designs as they associate and tune in to kids † ( Taguchi, 2006, p. 262 ) . Great teachers will hold high viewpoints for their researchers and will take a comprehensive assault and fundamentally ponder their securing. â€Å" Having high standpoints of researchers and holding a very much educa ted program regarding activity is other than of import † ( Ball, Russell A ; Smales, 2005, p. 290 ) . What kind of situations upgrade student obtaining? I accept we should gracefully a sustaining and animating condition for the children to hold a feeling of having a place and uplift their front securing to do associations and straightforwardness cultural cooperations with rises to. Nature ought to approve them by providing opportunities to investigate for all encompassing turn of events. As instructors I accept the earth should esteem kids ‘s musings and parts and back up their dispositions. The assets ought to back up kids ‘s requests and obtaining. The children ought to be viewed as dynamic researchers and equivalent possibilities ought to be accommodated all understudies. â€Å" Teachers will require to create comprehensive assaults and a schoolroom situation where all children are esteemed as people in

Booth, John Wilkes

Booth, John Wilkes Booth, John Wilkes wilks [key], 1838â€"65, American actor, the assassin of Abraham Lincoln , b. near Bel Air, Md.; son of Junius Brutus Booth and brother of Edwin Booth . He made his stage debut at the age of 17 in Baltimore. He later toured widely, winning acclaim mainly for his swordplay and physical effectiveness in Shakespearean roles, rather than for his weak acting ability. Unlike the rest of his family, Booth was an ardent Confederate sympathizer. He had joined (1859) the Virginia militia company that guarded John Brown on his way to execution and falsely claimed to have aided in his capture, but Booth did not enter Confederate service in the Civil War. Instead, he continued with his theatrical career in the North. For some six months in 1864â€"65 Booth laid plans to abduct the president and carry him to Richmond, a scheme that was frustrated when Lincoln failed to appear (Mar. 20, 1865) at the spot where Booth and his six fellow conspirators lay in wait. On Good Frida y, Apr. 14, 1865, Booth, having learned that Lincoln planned to attend Laura Keene's performance of Our American Cousin at Ford's Theater in Washington on that evening, plotted the simultaneous assassination of the President, Vice President Andrew Johnson , and Secretary of State William H. Seward . Lewis Thornton Powell, who called himself Payne, guided by David E. Herold, seriously wounded Seward and three others at Seward's house. George A. Atzerodt, assigned to Johnson, lost his nerve. The main act the egomaniacal Booth reserved for himself. His crime was committed shortly after 10 PM, when he entered the presidential box unobserved, shot Lincoln, and vaulted to the stage (breaking his left leg in the process) shouting Sic semper tyrannis! [thus always to tyrants] The South is avenged! He then went behind the scenes and down the back stairs to a waiting horse upon which he made his escape. Not until Apr. 26, after a hysterical two-week search by the army and secret ser vice forces, was he discovered, hiding in a barn on Garrett's farm near Bowling Green, Caroline co., Va. The barn was set afire and Booth was either shot by his pursuers or shot himself rather than surrender. Although it has been said that no dead body was ever more definitely identified, the mythâ€"completely unsupported by evidenceâ€"that Booth escaped has persisted. For the fate of others involved, see Surratt, Mary Eugenia . See memoir by his sister, Asia Booth Clarke (1930, repr. 1971, 1996); biographies by R. G. and K. O. Gutman (1979) and G. Samples (1982); M. W. Kauffman, American Brutus: John Wilkes Booth and the Lincoln Conspiracies (2004); N. Titone, My Thoughts Be Bloody: The Bitter Rivalry Between Edwin and John Wilkes Booth (2010). The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. See more Encyclopedia articles on: U.S. History: Biographies

An Introduction to Puritanism

Puritanism was a religious  reformation movement  that began in England in the late 1500s. Its initial goal was removing any remaining links to Catholicism within the  Church of England after its separation from the Catholic Church. To do this, Puritans sought to change the structure and ceremonies of the church. They also wanted broader lifestyle changes in England to align with their strong moral beliefs. Some Puritans emigrated to the New World and established colonies built around churches that fit those beliefs.  Puritanism had a broad impact on England’s religious laws and the founding and development of the colonies in America. Beliefs Some Puritans believed in total separation from the Anglican Church, while others simply sought reform and wished to remain a part of the church. The belief that the church should not have any rituals or ceremonies not found in the Bible united the two factions. They believed that the government should enforce morals and punish behavior such as drunkenness and swearing. However, Puritans did believe in religious freedom and generally respected the differences in belief systems of those outside the Church of England.   Some of the major disputes between the Puritans and the Anglican Church regarded the beliefs that priests should not wear vestments (clerical clothing), that ministers should actively spread the word of God, and that the church hierarchy (of bishops, archbishops, etc.) should be replaced with a committee of elders.   Regarding their relationships with God, Puritans believed that salvation was entirely up to God and that God had chosen only a select few to be saved, yet no one could know if they were among this group. They also believed that each person should have a personal covenant with God. The Puritans were influenced by  Calvinism and adopted its beliefs in predestination and the sinful nature of man. Puritans believed that all people must live by the Bible and should have a deep familiarity with the text. To achieve this, Puritans placed a strong emphasis on literacy and education.   Puritans in England Puritanism first emerged in the 16th and 17th centuries in England as a movement to remove all vestiges of Catholicism from the Anglican Church. The Anglican Church first separated from Catholicism in 1534, but when Queen Mary took the throne in 1553, she reverted it to Catholicism. Under Mary, many Puritans faced exile. This threat and the increasing prevalence of Calvinism—which provided support for their viewpoint—further strengthened Puritan beliefs. In 1558, Queen Elizabeth took the throne and reestablished the separation from Catholicism, but not thoroughly enough for the Puritans. The group rebelled and, as a result, were prosecuted for refusing to abide by laws that required specific religious practices. This factor contributed to the eruption of the English civil war between the Parliamentarians and the Royalists, who fought in part over religious freedom in 1642.   Puritans in America   In 1608, some Puritans moved from England to Holland. In 1620, they boarded the Mayflower to Massachusetts, where they established Plymouth Colony. In 1628, another group of Puritans founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Puritans eventually spread throughout New England, establishing new self-governing churches. To become a full member of the church, seekers had to testify of their personal relationship with God. Only those who could demonstrate a godly lifestyle were permitted to join.   The witch trials of the late 1600s in places like Salem were run by the Puritans religious and moral beliefs. But as the 17th century wore on, the cultural strength of the Puritans gradually waned. As the first generation of immigrants died out, their children and grandchildren became less connected with the church. By 1689, the majority of New Englanders thought of themselves as Protestants rather than Puritans, though many of them were just as sharply opposed to Catholicism. As the religious movement in America eventually fractured into many groups (such as Quakers, Baptists, Methodists, and more), Puritanism became more of an underlying philosophy than a religion. It evolved into a way of life focused on self-reliance, moral sturdiness, tenacity, political isolationism, and austere living. These beliefs gradually evolved into a secular lifestyle that was (and sometimes is) thought of as a distinctly New England mentality.

Henriette Delille New Orleans Religious Order Founder

Known for:  founding an African American religious order in New Orleans; the order provided education for free and enslaved black people, contrary to Louisiana law Dates:  1812 - 1862 About Henriette Delille: Henriette Delille was born in New Orleans between 1810 and 1813, most sources agree on 1812. Her father was a white man and her mother a free person of color, of mixed race. Both were Roman Catholics. Her parents could not be married under Louisiana law, but the arrangement was common in Creole society.   Her great great grandmother was among slaves brought from Africa, and she became free when her owner died.   She was able to earn enough to free her daughter and two grandchildren by payment for their freedom. Henriette Delille was influenced by Sister Marthe Fontier, who opened a school in New Orleans for girls of color. Henriette Delille herself refused to follow the practice of her mother and two siblings and identify as white. Another sister was in a relationship much like their mother had been, living with but not able to marry a white man, and having his children.   Henriette Delille also defied her mother to work with slaves, nonwhites, and whites among the poor of New Orleans. Henriette Delille worked within church institutions, but when she tried to become a postulant, she was refused by both Ursuline and Carmelite orders because of her color. If shed passed for white, she most likely would have been admitted. With a friend Juliette Gaudin, also a free person of color, Henriette Delille established a home for the elderly and bought a house to teach religion, both serving nonwhites. In teaching nonwhites, she defied the law against educating nonwhites. With Juliette Gaudin and another free person of color, Josephine Charles, Henriette Delille gathered interested women together, and they founded a sisterhood, Sisters of the Holy Family. They provided nursing care and a home for orphans. They took vows before Pere Rousselon, a white French immigrant, in 1842, and adopted a plain religious habit and a rule (regulations for living) written primarily by Delille. The sisters were noted for their nursing care during two yellow fever epidemics in New Orleans, in 1853 and 1897. Henriette Delille lived until 1862.    Her will gave freedom to a woman named Betsy who had been a slave owned by Delille until her death. After her death, the order grew from the 12 members it included at the end of her lifetime to a peak of 400 in the 1950s. As with many Roman Catholic orders, the number of sisters dwindled after that and the average age increased significantly, as fewer young women entered. Canonization Process In the 1960s, the Sisters of the Holy Family began exploring canonization  of Henriette Delille. They formally opened their cause with the Vatican in 1988, at which time Pope John Paul II recognized her as Servant of God, a first phase that can culminate in sainthood (the subsequent steps are venerable, blessed, then saint).   Reports of favors and possible miracles were reported, and investigations on a possible miracle were wrapped up in 2005. In 2006, after the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints at the Vatican received the documentation, they declared a miracle. The second of the four phases towards sainthood has been completed, with a declaration of Henriette Delille as venerable in 2010 by Pope Benedict XVI.   Beatification would follow once the proper Vatican authorities determine that a second miracle can be attributed to her intercession. Popular Culture In 2001, Lifetime cable premiered a movie about Henriette Delille, The Courage to Love. The project was promoted by and starred Vanessa Williams.   In 2004, a biography by Rev. Cyprian Davis was published.

Challenge in My Life How I Dealt with It Free Essays

I Just decided to take some medicine and went to bed. The pains still continue to happen the next day. So I went to the emergency room. We will write a custom essay sample on Challenge in My Life: How I Dealt with It or any similar topic only for you Order Now I told the doctor my situation. I had taken some x-rays. About thirty minutes later the results were back. The doctor had discovered a large mass In my stomach and wasn’t for certain. So I was recommended to the Broody School of Medicine. That place Is thirty minutes from where I live. The doctors there looked at my x-rays and did some more tests on me. The BOB-GUN had found an ovarian tumor on my ovaries. Then I was explained to that I was going to have immediate surgery. I never had a surgery before I was scared for my life. The doctors also mention that my being overweight that puts a risk with the surgery. The first thing I thought with that being stated I knew I was going to die. As the days went by I had to go the doctor every two weeks. It was like if I was having a baby. Matter of fact I look like I was pregnant with twins. I guess that was nothing but all that the fluid from the tumor. I would cry everyday and I became depressed. I began to get weak each and everyday. So I had to get a blood transfusion. I remember staying In the hospital the entire weekend. I did not want to all because it was holiday. It was Labor Day weekend. I wanted to stay home and enjoy my family. Once I had received the blood in my body I felt much stronger. Then it was time for my surgery. I remember my surgery was September 7, 2005. I was nervous, shaky and scared. My family was by my side. I remember waking up the next day after surgery. When I woke up I thought it was still Wednesday the day I had surgery. Scary right! I had all types of tubes and things I was hooked up to. I was in the trauma center in the intensive care unit. I felt awesome. God is so good. There was no pain my body. Everyday I still think about what I went through with the sickness that was In my DOD. There was so much pressure and pain all on the Inside In my body. The only thing I can’t do now Is to have kids. That still bother me but I am learning to overcome. I want to adopt children very soon. My plan Is to begin the adoption process when I am 30 years old. Has changed my life dramatically. Because if I didn’t have faith in me and God on my side I might be lying in my grave or my body will still be with pain. Challenges happen for a reason. It can be for good or bad. People are put to a test to overcome challenges. Most of all we deal the challenges and overcome it with a success. How to cite Challenge in My Life: How I Dealt with It, Papers

Challenge in My Life How I Dealt with It Free Essays

I Just decided to take some medicine and went to bed. The pains still continue to happen the next day. So I went to the emergency room. We will write a custom essay sample on Challenge in My Life: How I Dealt with It or any similar topic only for you Order Now I told the doctor my situation. I had taken some x-rays. About thirty minutes later the results were back. The doctor had discovered a large mass In my stomach and wasn’t for certain. So I was recommended to the Broody School of Medicine. That place Is thirty minutes from where I live. The doctors there looked at my x-rays and did some more tests on me. The BOB-GUN had found an ovarian tumor on my ovaries. Then I was explained to that I was going to have immediate surgery. I never had a surgery before I was scared for my life. The doctors also mention that my being overweight that puts a risk with the surgery. The first thing I thought with that being stated I knew I was going to die. As the days went by I had to go the doctor every two weeks. It was like if I was having a baby. Matter of fact I look like I was pregnant with twins. I guess that was nothing but all that the fluid from the tumor. I would cry everyday and I became depressed. I began to get weak each and everyday. So I had to get a blood transfusion. I remember staying In the hospital the entire weekend. I did not want to all because it was holiday. It was Labor Day weekend. I wanted to stay home and enjoy my family. Once I had received the blood in my body I felt much stronger. Then it was time for my surgery. I remember my surgery was September 7, 2005. I was nervous, shaky and scared. My family was by my side. I remember waking up the next day after surgery. When I woke up I thought it was still Wednesday the day I had surgery. Scary right! I had all types of tubes and things I was hooked up to. I was in the trauma center in the intensive care unit. I felt awesome. God is so good. There was no pain my body. Everyday I still think about what I went through with the sickness that was In my DOD. There was so much pressure and pain all on the Inside In my body. The only thing I can’t do now Is to have kids. That still bother me but I am learning to overcome. I want to adopt children very soon. My plan Is to begin the adoption process when I am 30 years old. Has changed my life dramatically. Because if I didn’t have faith in me and God on my side I might be lying in my grave or my body will still be with pain. Challenges happen for a reason. It can be for good or bad. People are put to a test to overcome challenges. Most of all we deal the challenges and overcome it with a success. How to cite Challenge in My Life: How I Dealt with It, Papers